tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3021296168065492193.post2853911153569895171..comments2007-09-28T12:31:27.160ZMatt Dhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11039571493251583695noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3021296168065492193.post-513095348703581532007-09-28T12:31:00.000Z2007-09-28T12:31:00.000ZI wrote that little "ten years after" review a while ago and very much agree with some of your comments about some of the failures not actually being "failures." For example, the notion that online things can be non-linear (and there isn't much of that non-linear design in online storytelling) might have been seen as a failure of using the potential. But we did a study on navigation through slide shows and by far, even when presented with choices that would allow non-linear browsing of the materials in the slide show, people clicked through linearly. Habit? or just a more comfortable, logical way of engaging. Here is an article about the study: <A HREF="http://www.ojr.org/ojr/stories/070614paul/index.cfm" REL="nofollow">Navigating slide shows: What do people choose when every choice is possible?</A>Norahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07723839227482822326noreply@blogger.com